All info is provided for illustrative purposes only. There are no implied or explicit guarantees as to the efficacy of info provided, nor should the info be relied upon for any tax or legal purposes whatsoever. We are NEVER attorneys. We are only your CPA if legally engaged to be your CPA. Now, for those blog posts...
Showing posts with label CPA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPA. Show all posts

How the CARES Act of 2020 and Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2018 Combined to create a Tax Refund Opportunity for Taxpayers subject to §280E

How the CARES Act of 2020 and Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2018 Combined to create a Tax Refund Opportunity for Taxpayers subject to §280E

Ben Condon, CPA
Ben Condon, CPA

The CARES Act of 2020 provided a five-year carry-back for losses earned in 2018, 2019, or 2020, which allows firms to modify tax returns up to five years prior to offset taxable income from those tax years.

That means a taxpayer could claim refunds from all the way back to 2013 if they generated a loss in 2018, 2014 if 2019 loss, and 2015 if 2020 loss. 

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2018 added Sec. 471(c) to the Internal Revenue Code in order to simplify accounting for ending inventory for small taxpayers.  

This allows a taxpayer with annual gross receipts less than $25 million to use its own consistently applied books, records and accounting procedures to calculate COGS and to write-off ending inventory completely, potentially unlocking losses for  taxpayers. 

An aggressive, but defensible position a taxpayer could make, would be to make the accounting change to 471(c) and capitalize and run through COGS all or a portion of the cumulative costs that were previously not allowed to be taken due to the taxpayers' inventory method.  

For example, if they were a retailer and forced to use 1.471-3(b) inventory at costs for retailers (see Harborside case) previously, where they could only deduct the vendor price of their inventory as COGS and all other costs were denied, they could make the case to capitalize and run through their 2019 or 2020 COGS many years of now capitalize-able costs through COGS. The rent, security, bud-tender wages, etc. that the taxpayer can now include in their COGS could be retroactively quantified and included in beginning inventory which would then flush through COGS resulting in a large current year tax loss.

This would pull costs that were previously nondeductible into the present taxable loss, which would then be carried back to those years when those costs were disallowed under 280E.

The switch to 471(c) typically requires a Form 3115 - Application for Change in Account method, which must be filed by the extended tax deadline.  There's still time to make this change for tax year 2019 if extended, and plenty of time to plan for this if making the change for tax year 2020.

This is a game changer that could eliminate the historical damage 280E has done to many companies and provide historical tax relief via a windfall refund! 


If you would like to have us review your returns for possible tax savings, please reach out to us at 503-303-3730 or email info@b-cconsulting.com. 

The 2018 Farm Bill - What it Means for Hemp Farmers' Tax Bill

Ben Condon, CPA
Ben Condon, CPA Covers the Income Tax Implications for Hemp Farms after the new 2018 Farm Bill
The Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (the 2018 Farm Bill) has officially been signed into law.  One of the major components of this legislation of industrial hemp.  This blog post will mainly focus on what the tax implications of this legalization and contrast tax differences of a federal legal hemp business versus a federally illegal business subject to section 280E. 

Why Hemp? For traditional farmers, rising costs and imports of foreign low-priced produce have made it difficult to turn a profit. There is currently a glut of recreational cannabis producers in Oregon driving down the wholesale prices so low most producers can afford to continue to operate. Cannabis cultivation is also heavily regulated including the canopy size a grower can use.  As a result, the switch to hemp is logical choice. 

280E No Longer Applies
Previously, hemp related businesses were often subject to section 280E, and therefore could not take any business deductions or credits, and the only cost recovery is via cost of goods sold. This is no longer the case, now hemp producers can tap into the favorable farm tax rules, which we'll dive into. 

No Need to Track Inventory
For farms with less than $25 million in gross receipts over the past three years, there's no need to track inventory.  What does that mean? It means there's no add-back to taxable income for ending inventory.  If a farm has not sold off all of its year's harvest prior to year end, it still can deduct all of the costs into it took to produce it. Previously, when hemp was a controlled substance, the act of growing hemp (and still for cannabis) was deemed manufacturing, not farming, which requires an add-back of ending inventory at year end. 

Expanded Use of Cash Method of Accounting
Again, farms with less than $25 million in gross receipts over the past three years can use the cash method of accounting. What does this mean? With the cash method available, and no requirement to track inventory, It means that a farms will have a great ability to manage their taxable income by purchasing supplies, fertilizers, equipment, ect. in preparation for the next year's harvest and take those deductions in the current year.  

Bonus Depreciation and Sec. 179 Expending
Until January 1, 2024 eligible equipment is available for immediate 100% bonus depreciation.  This now applies to certain used property too, previously, property needed to be brand new for use to be eligible.  

Sec. 179 provides for the full immediate deduction similar to 100% bonus depreciation, and has generous dollar limits up to $1 million can be immediately deducted in 2018 (with several limitations and thresholds).  Sec. 179 is available for single-purpose horticultural structures. 

Greater Access to Banking and Borrowing
Most businesses take the ability to bank for granted. Without the ability to bank, businesses are at risk of theft and record keeping can be very cumbersome. With banking bookkeeping is made easy, your cash is kept safe and counted at all times, and you're able to send and receive large sums of money safely and securely.   Also, without banking, the ability to borrow or obtain a line of credit was nearly impossible. 

Farms with a solid business plan and history of earnings should theoretically now have access to borrowing. Borrowing or leveraging can allow a business to expand with little capital and can greatly increase the return on investment if done effectively. 

Recipe for Success 
With the ability to borrow and by employing the favorable tax rules listed above, a hemp farm has the ability to expand rapidly virtually income tax-free by reinvesting its earnings into the various immediately deductible items.  That is, of course, until its average gross receipts exceeds $25 million per year, not a bad place to be.